MoreMisterNice

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, July 19, 2013

Posted on 4:03 PM by Unknown
THE PRESIDENT SPEAKS, AND DAVID BROOKS RETHINKS STAND YOUR GROUND

President Obama spoke at length today about the shooting of Trayvon Martin. On NPR, David Brooks praised the president's remarks -- though mostly because, in Brooks's interpretation (which isn't really accurate), the remarks spread the blame around equally. Here's part of what Brooks said:
They were strikingly personal. I thought they were Obama at his best, the Obama we saw in 2008, 2007, someone who is sympathetic to all sides. And he was sympathetic to the police, he's sympathetic to -- he gave the context especially for African-American experience and how many African-Americans are responding to this case. He gave the legal context. And so it was a broad tour d'horizon, you could say, of the whole situation, arriving at, I thought, a pretty moderate and responsible and mature position, which was the legal system did its work, it has to be respected, this really isn't a federal case in most cases. And so he arrived at a, I think, a pretty responsible position at the end of the day, at the same time giving voice to a whole range of conflicting feelings, conflicting thoughts, conflicting ideas, and I think giving all Americans a sense of what other people are feeling, why they're reacting the way they are. I thought it was a deeply unifying statement.
I shouldn't complain when Brooks is deviating from right-wing thinking, but I don't think anything Obama said was "conflicting" -- nuanced, yes, but not conflicting. For instance, Obama said this:
And the fact that a lot of African American boys are painted with a broad brush and the excuse is given, well, there are these statistics out there that show that African American boys are more violent -- using that as an excuse to then see sons treated differently causes pain.

I think the African American community is also not naive in understanding that, statistically, somebody like Trayvon Martin was statistically more likely to be shot by a peer than he was by somebody else. So folks understand the challenges that exist for African American boys. But they get frustrated, I think, if they feel that there’s no context for it and that context is being denied.
There's no conflict there -- he simply thinks that the crime rate among young black males does not jutify ignoring historical and social contexts or treating young black males as suspects rather than citizens.

And frankly, it's not true that Obama was "sympathetic to all sides" in these remarks. Obama did not express sympathy to George Zimmerman, or extend a hand to his supporters. (I assume this is because, y'know, George Zimmerman killed someone who happened to be unarmed.)

Obama spoke about Stand Your Ground laws -- and, again, I don't think he was "sympathetic to all sides" (nor should he have been):
And for those who resist that idea that we should think about something like these "stand your ground" laws, I'd just ask people to consider, if Trayvon Martin was of age and armed, could he have stood his ground on that sidewalk? And do we actually think that he would have been justified in shooting Mr. Zimmerman who had followed him in a car because he felt threatened? And if the answer to that question is at least ambiguous, then it seems to me that we might want to examine those kinds of laws.
Hearing this made David Brooks reconsider his position on these laws:
And I have to say, the point on the Stand Your Ground law was actually clarifying for me. I had some sympathy for the laws because as, you know, as Americans, we should be independent, we should be able to defend ourselves, be strong. But the argument he made about, you know, do we really want all sorts of people, do we really want what happened here, people walking around with guns feeling free to shoot off without legal protections, without the normal legal process -- now, that's a compelling argument, which he put very well.
Yes, Brooks actually said he'd never quite thought about the possibility of extending Stand Your Ground to "all sorts of people." Yes, even those sorts. When you put it that way, Stand Your Ground is kinda scary, hunh, David?

Nice work, Professor Obama.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • (no title)
    MORE FROM CATHIE ADAMS: THE SECRET INTERNATIONALIST CAPITALIZATION AGENDA! You may have seen this story: A speaker at a tea party event in ...
  • (no title)
    MORAL EQUIVALENCE, GRADED ON A SOCIOECONOMIC CURVE A confession from a known serial rapist and a DNA match to that serial rapist made clea...
  • (no title)
    GUN LOBBYIST DEFINES DEMOCRATS AS PREY Heard on NPR this morning, in a story about President Obama's trip to Colorado to Colorado toda...
  • (no title)
    BUT ROSS, THERE REALLY IS NO "LIBERTARIAN POPULIST" WING OF THE GOP In today's column, Ross Douthat invokes Bolingbroke'...
  • (no title)
    ...AS OPPOSED TO THE REST OF WASHINGTON, WHICH IS SO SELF-EFFACING Here are the opening paragraphs of Keith Koffler's new Politico col...
  • (no title)
    RELAX -- IT'S NOT 2002 A lot of folks in the left blogosphere are upset at the appearance of a New York Times op-ed urging the U....
  • (no title)
    YIKES (updated) (From the Facebook page of the shooting sports magazine AmmoLand. School Shield is the recent NRA task force proposal fo...
  • (no title)
    PAGING CHRISTOPHER NOLAN I'm bored with the Edward Snowden story. He's been indicted now on Espionage Act charges, but it sure look...
  • (no title)
    TELL ME AGAIN ABOUT HOW THE GOP IS DYING Remember that Reince Priebus Republican "autopsy"? Remember being told that the Republ...
  • (no title)
    THE NEW YORK POST : TOO BIG TO FAIL? Really, what was the potential downside for the New York Post when its editors put an entirely inno...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (500)
    • ►  September (41)
    • ►  August (77)
    • ▼  July (83)
      • LIMBAUGH IS A TROLL, BUT SOME OF THE PEOPLE HE'S ...
      • TED CRUZ KNOWS THAT THE GOP'S CRAZY BASE DOESN'T ...
      • PLEASE DON'T SPOIL THIS MAGIC MOMENT, MAINSTREAM ...
      • INSTAPUNDIT: THE LESSON OF THE BRADLEY MANNING ST...
      • LIZ CHENEY: THE BOSS'S DAUGHTERAlex Roarty of Nat...
      • POPE FRANCIS: GOOD COPI guess I'm supposed to be ...
      • DEAR POLITICS JUNKIES: YOU WOULD KNOW WEINERGATE ...
      • WHY THE HELL DO THE KOCH BROTHERS CARE ABOUT PENM...
      • YES, TED CRUZ IS THE GOP BASE'S #1 CRUSHIt's offic...
      • BUT ROSS, THERE REALLY IS NO "LIBERTARIAN POPULIS...
      • THIRD-WORLD TEXAS?Juanita Jean spots this, which ...
      • PAT BUCHANAN: A VOTE FOR WEINER AND SPITZER IS A ...
      • OBJECTIVE-FACT-ABOUT-LONG-DECEASED-ENEMY-GATE!!!He...
      • CHRIS CHRISTIE IS RUNNING FOR THE 2008 REPUBLICAN...
      • THE BEATINGS WILL CONTINUE UNTIL MORALE IMPROVEST...
      • OH, MARCO, ABORTION EXTREMISM WILL NOT SAVE YOUBa...
      • A LECTURE FROM RAMBO GIGOTThe Wall Street Journal...
      • THEN AGAIN, MAYBE DEMOCRATS WILL WIN THE PRESIDEN...
      • THIS IS A DEPRESSING RACE FOR MAYOR, NOT PRIMARIL...
      • NEW YORK TIMES PREVIEWS FIRST HUNDRED DAYS OF THE ...
      • REGARDING WEINER, THE TIMES AND DAILY NEWS APPAREN...
      • AMERICANS DREAM OF GYPSIES, I HAVE FOUNDI'm sure ...
      • HMMM ... THE ZIMMERMAN NOT-GUILTY VERDICT HAPPENS...
      • WHY I READ SOCIAL-SCIENCE STORIES WITH A BIG GRAI...
      • HOW YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO GET HELP FROM THE GOVERNME...
      • NO SUCH THING AS SOCIETY? (PART II)A few days ago...
      • PICS OR IT DIDN'T HAPPENLook, I'm not going to ex...
      • ALLEN WEST INSULTS BLACK PARENTS SO YOU'LL FORGET...
      • IS THE TEA PARTY A PAPER TIGER LIKE THE NRA?This ...
      • TELL ME AGAIN HOW MSNBC IS EXACTLY THE SAME AS FO...
      • I GUESS IT DEPENDS ON WHERE THE JACKBOOT LANDSThe ...
      • SALON'S RICH BENJAMIN REINFORCES RIGHT-WING MEMESI...
      • NO, A WARM, FUZZY TED CRUZ IS NOT GOING TO BEAT H...
      • THE PRESIDENT SPEAKS, AND DAVID BROOKS RETHINKS S...
      • RAY KELLY LOOKED GOOD -- RELATIVELY SPEAKINGIn Th...
      • PHOTO RELEASED TO REBUT ROLLING STONE TSARNAEV CO...
      • IN A FEW DECADES, WILL THERE REALLY BE NO SUCH THI...
      • WE WON'T GET A PATH TO CITIZENSHIP FOR UNDOCUMENT...
      • COMPLETELY VOLUNTARY EXERCISE: WORSE THAN HITLERI...
      • DO WE HAVE MULTIPLE CRAZY ABSOLUTIST WINGNUT PART...
      • COVER OF ROLLING STONE INFURIATES PEOPLE WHO CAN'...
      • UM, MAYBE THE GOP WON'T BE ABLE TO SUPPRESS THE CR...
      • TRYING TO IMAGINE WILLIAM SALETAN'S EMMETT TILL #...
      • MSNBC, NOT EXACTLY BUILDING A BROAD PROGRESSIVE C...
      • THEM THAT'S GOT SHALL GET, THEM THAT'S NOT SHALL ...
      • IS SOMEONE IN MURDOCHLAND CENSORING YESTERDAY'S AN...
      • I'M NOT SURE ZIMMERMAN WILL BECOME A FULL-FLEDGED...
      • DON'T MARCH. BOYCOTT.I feared from the beginning ...
      • AFTER FAKE PILOT NAMES ARE BROADCAST, A POWER TOOL...
      • DISCO DEMOLITION NIGHT AND THE REAGAN BACKLASHOver...
      • IN CASE YOU WEREN'T SUFFICIENTLY UNDERMOTIVATED......
      • DO REPUBLICANS EVEN NEED AN AGENDA TO WIN BACK "MI...
      • THE RESULT OF COLORADO'S SECESSION HISSYFIT COULD...
      • ET TU, RUPERT?Poor Freepers ... even Fox is betra...
      • HOW DEMOCRATS DEAL WITH ABORTION IN A STATE WHERE...
      • BUY TICKETS FOR WOODSTOCK-FOR-WINGNUTS, STARRING ...
      • CONSERVATIVES DON'T HATE LEGISLATION. CONSERVATIV...
      • MOST UPSET ABOUT NSA SURVEILLANCE: WHITE GUYSSome...
      • WILL THE DEATH OF IMMIGRATION REFORM BE EXCELLENT...
      • YEAH, I'D BOYCOTT THESE ADVERTISERSI'm not home fo...
      • DENIAL: STILL A RIVER IN THE BELTWAYYou may have s...
      • RED ATTACKS RED: RIGHT-WING SITE EXPOSES RAND PAU...
      • WOW, THAT NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE OBAMA! OH, WAIT....
      • THE GOP'S FRESH FACENPR, part of Your Liberal Medi...
      • IF YOU WORK FOR EMC INSURANCE, YOU MIGHT WANT TO ...
      • SPITZER: BAD JUDGMENT WITH HIS PANTS ON?Thank you...
      • Objections on monitor may be closer than they appear
      • Considering the source on Snowden
      • New adventures in GOP hostage taking
      • Adventures in responsible gun ownership
      • Like Wrestling a Rubber Octopus
      • You don't have to go home, but you can't stay here
      • Sweet land of liberty
      • Land of the free
      • See You Next Week
      • The "Restoring Honor and Dignity" Party
      • Welcome to D.C. Politics, Circa 2015 or 2017
      • Even a Fox News Doctor Thinks Zimmerman Is Exagger...
      • Personality Cults? Sure. Movements for Change? Not...
      • They Have Seen the Future, and It Works?
      • I Owe My Soul to the Company's Banker
      • Not Nasty Enough
      • The New Republic's Special Stupid Issue
    • ►  June (83)
    • ►  May (92)
    • ►  April (94)
    • ►  March (30)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile