MoreMisterNice

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, May 2, 2013

Posted on 5:42 AM by Unknown
THEIR POSITION ON BACKGROUND CHECKS IS "LIBERALS SUCK"

Mediaite's Tommy Christopher is banging his head on his desk because polls show that Americans' opinions on guns make no sense:
... Recently, Pew polled a group of people who presumably also support background checks at around 90%, yet only 47% of them were displeased that the Republicans killed the background check law. That means that a great many of the poll's respondents were "happy" or "relieved" that a law they supported did not pass. What the hell?

... in [a] Gallup poll out this week, respondents were asked "Do you think the Senate should or should not have passed the measure to expand background checks for gun purchases?"

A large majority, 65%, said yes, although that's significantly less than the 90% support background checks have enjoyed in nearly every poll.

Then, these exact same people were asked "Would you vote for or against a law that would require background checks for all gun purchases?"

Not only is this almost exactly the same question, but the wording on the second question is actually slightly stronger than the first. The result? 83% said they would vote yes, which means that 51% of the people who didn't say the Senate should have passed "expanded" background checks said they would, themselves, vote to pass background checks for all gun purchases.
So why would people who support stricter background checks not support a stricter-background-check law (even though they'd vote for one themselves in a referendum)?

Well, there's yet another poll today, from The New York Times and CBS, and it has similar results: 88% support for background checks on all purchases, but 41% support for President Obama's approach to the gun issue.

And that seems to be the point, at least according to one respondent:
"I'm for stricter gun laws, but the reason I favor the Republicans over the Democrats and the liberals on gun laws is because they have always been against the Second Amendment and the right to own guns," said Jim Hensley, 69, a Republican from Grandville, Mich., in an interview after the poll was conducted.
In other words: Republicans did what I didn't want them to do, Democrats wanted to do what I did want them to do -- but I still support Republicans because I've always heard that Democrats disagree with me.

Really, that's it: A lot of conservatives and right-centrists support the policy of stronger background checks, but they're so conditioned to distrust Democrats that they can't support the policy they support because Democrats support it.

This isn't about logic. It's about tribal loyalties and tribal hatreds, the latter reinforced by decades of tribal-hatred propaganda.

Mr. Hensley goes on to say:
"Yes, I believe the Republicans should have voted for background checks, and they should not legalize automatic weapons," Mr. Hensley added. "I was against the repeal of the ban on automatic weapons, and I don't support the N.R.A. But it's like marriage. You stick with your wife no matter what, and you don’t just ditch your political party on one issue."
So because of party loyalty, he opposes the party that does what he supports.

And in the Gallup poll, opponents of the actual background-check bill -- including the ones who'd have voted for a theoretical background-check referendum -- give reasons for their bill opposition that suggest loyalty to the NRA and its talking points:





Republicans and right-leaning groups understand how public opinion works. Democrats and liberal groups don't. Republicans and right-leaning groups know that the point is to create generalized feelings of hatred toward the other guys, as well as hatred on specific points, and reinforce that sense of tribalism every hour of every day.

It works. It's worked with virtually all of heartland white America. And our side still tries to fight back with logic and reason. That will never be enough.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • (no title)
    MORE FROM CATHIE ADAMS: THE SECRET INTERNATIONALIST CAPITALIZATION AGENDA! You may have seen this story: A speaker at a tea party event in ...
  • (no title)
    MORAL EQUIVALENCE, GRADED ON A SOCIOECONOMIC CURVE A confession from a known serial rapist and a DNA match to that serial rapist made clea...
  • (no title)
    GUN LOBBYIST DEFINES DEMOCRATS AS PREY Heard on NPR this morning, in a story about President Obama's trip to Colorado to Colorado toda...
  • (no title)
    BUT ROSS, THERE REALLY IS NO "LIBERTARIAN POPULIST" WING OF THE GOP In today's column, Ross Douthat invokes Bolingbroke'...
  • (no title)
    ...AS OPPOSED TO THE REST OF WASHINGTON, WHICH IS SO SELF-EFFACING Here are the opening paragraphs of Keith Koffler's new Politico col...
  • (no title)
    RELAX -- IT'S NOT 2002 A lot of folks in the left blogosphere are upset at the appearance of a New York Times op-ed urging the U....
  • (no title)
    YIKES (updated) (From the Facebook page of the shooting sports magazine AmmoLand. School Shield is the recent NRA task force proposal fo...
  • (no title)
    PAGING CHRISTOPHER NOLAN I'm bored with the Edward Snowden story. He's been indicted now on Espionage Act charges, but it sure look...
  • (no title)
    TELL ME AGAIN ABOUT HOW THE GOP IS DYING Remember that Reince Priebus Republican "autopsy"? Remember being told that the Republ...
  • (no title)
    THE NEW YORK POST : TOO BIG TO FAIL? Really, what was the potential downside for the New York Post when its editors put an entirely inno...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (500)
    • ►  September (41)
    • ►  August (77)
    • ►  July (83)
    • ►  June (83)
    • ▼  May (92)
      • UM, THE 1998 MIDTERMS REALLY WEREN'T THAT GREAT FO...
      • YEAH, WHEN YOU CALL MY NAME I SALIVATE LIKE A PAV...
      • ET TU, McCLATCHY? YOU FELL FOR CATHERINE ENGELBRE...
      • ASKED AND ANSWERED(updated)The wingnuttosphere is...
      • I THINK I KNOW WHAT MIGHT SAVE MSNBC There's a lo...
      • THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION'S INORDINATE FONDNESS FO...
      • WAS MICHELE BACHMANN FRAGGED?Michele Bachmann has ...
      • A GAY CANDIDATE WHO'S MORE POPULAR WITH NON-WHITES...
      • WHEN THE GOING GETS PARANOID, THE PARANOID TURN P...
      • CAN SOMEONE EXPLAIN THIS "SOCIAL WELFARE" TAX THI...
      • BLAMING INDIVIDUALS TO AVOID BLAMING THE SYSTEMDe...
      • NO, AMERICA DOESN'T AGREE WITH THE GOP ON HEALTH C...
      • SOME GROUPS THE IRS TARGETED REALLY WERE POLITICA...
      • A TWINGE OF GUILT, BOB?I suppose it's good that B...
      • THIS IS THE GOP'S PLAN FOR THE ENTIRE COUNTRYIn t...
      • ALL SIGNS POINT TO "YES, OBAMA IS THE ANTICHRIST"...
      • SUPERVILLAIN OBAMA CONTINUES TO USE TIME MACHINE ...
      • MORE IDIOCY FROM CNN AND POLITICOCNN is scandaliz...
      • GOP SENATE CANDIDATE: BRINGING UP MY CHARACTER AS...
      • BROS FOR ECONOMIC DARWINISMIt's way too early to b...
      • I ASSUME OBAMA WANTED TO BE HECKLED BY MEDEA BENJ...
      • THE ALL-CONTROLLING FASCIST WHO WON'T LEADI assum...
      • YOUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK?The first screening of t...
      • THE REAL ENEMY, ACCORDING TO FOX NEWSLet's see: T...
      • OBAMA IS EVIL -- THEY JUST CAN'T AGREE ON WHYThis...
      • THE TEA PARTY: PRODUCED AND ABANDONEDMichael Shea...
      • A GRAND UNIFIED THEORY OF GOVERNMENT-CREATED TORN...
      • WHY REPUBLICANS CAN POLITICIZE DISASTER RELIEF AN...
      • SCANDAL MONOMANIA IS THE NEW DEFICIT MONOMANIAAno...
      • GUESS WHICH STATES ALL THOSE "TAKERS" ON DISABILI...
      • HIGH-MINDEDNESSToday:Folks, I have no patience fo...
      • SOMETIMES THE DUMB RUBES ARE ONE-PERCENTERSI don'...
      • I BET I'LL LIVE TO SEE THE DAY WHEN RIGHT-WINGERS...
      • HEAR NO EXTREMISM, SEE NO EXTREMISMYou may have s...
      • ONLY WINGNUTS ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO BELIEVE THAT A ...
      • MAYBE YOU SHOULD TAKE YOUR OWN ADVICE, MODOMaureen...
      • FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, NO, OBAMA IS NOT THE FIRST PR...
      • IF THIS IS YOUR BABY IN AN INCUBATOR, MAYBE YOU O...
      • IF THEY WERE TRYING TO INFLUENCE THE ELECTION, TH...
      • AMERICA IS A MORAL CESSPOOL, AND IT'S ALL YOUR FA...
      • ALLEGED PARTISAN OBAMACARE ENFORCER: HIRED UNDER ...
      • CATHOLIC LEAGUE'S DONOHUE: OBAMA IS SO EVIL HE CO...
      • LET'S RESTRICT GOVERNMENT ACCESS TO GOVERNMENT DOC...
      • DELAY-GATE!Yesterday, President Obama took steps ...
      • CAN'T STOP, WON'T STOPIf you're a sane person, yo...
      • THE OBLIVIOUS AWFULNESS OF MAUREEN DOWDThe second...
      • ACTUALLY, AMERICANS HAVE A SLIGHTLY MORE FAVORABL...
      • DO ALLEN AND VANDEHEI HAVE TO MARRY BEN BRADLEE N...
      • THAT'S NOT HOW REPUBLICANS ROLLSaw this tweet fro...
      • A LIBERAL GROUP TARGETED BY THE IRS?A political bl...
      • SHAKING MY HEADAs you probably know, the Justice ...
      • BUT REPUBLICANS WOULD NEVER POLITICIZE THE QUESTI...
      • EXPLAIN THIS ONE TO ME, RIGHT-WINGERSFox News, Ju...
      • SQUIRREL!I know what Public Policy Polling should ...
      • THE GOOD ANGEL ON THE GOP'S SHOULDER THAT ONLY BE...
      • YIKES(updated)(From the Facebook page of the shoo...
      • REPUBLICANS HAVE DONE MORE HARM TO THE TEA PARTY L...
      • THE ALL-POWERFUL ANTICHRISTLet's see if I've got ...
      • THE PRIMAL BLAME IMPULSEWe've all had problems wi...
      • SIX-PLUS MONTHS OF WALL-TO-WALL RIGHT-WING BENGHA...
      • DEFINING WINGNUTTERY DOWNThis sort of thing has a...
      • CLINTONS SABOTAGING THEMSELVES IN ORDER TO DENY OB...
      • THIS WEEK IN TRADITIONAL CHRISTIAN MARRIAGEMy favo...
      • RICHARD BLUMENTHAL IS A HERO. MIKE LEE IS A LYING...
      • WILL NO ONE RID US OF THESE MEDDLESOME PRIESTS?Pe...
      • THE FLAW IN THE DEMOCRATS' TED CRUZ STRATEGYBrian...
      • OOPSFront page of today's New York Post:Benghazi d...
      • THE PRESIDENT OF RED AMERICA SHOWS HIS DEEP AND A...
      • THE GOP'S ANTI-HRC LONG GAMEIt's obvious why the R...
      • REVERSE BRADLEY EFFECT IN SOUTH CAROLINA?Mark San...
      • JUST WHEN I WAS CONCERNED THAT RIGHT-WINGERS MIGH...
      • THE GUN ABSOLUTIST COMMUNITY IS AMERICA'S CONTROL...
      • THIS, NOT WORKING CONDITIONS, SENDS BANGLADESHIS O...
      • DIRTY TRICKS AND GAY-BAITING: WHAT GETS YOU A EUL...
      • TERRORISM FOR THE HELL OF ITSo we learned about t...
      • RIGHT STILL EXPECTING PUBLIC TO MAKE FINE DISTINC...
      • THE ANTICHRIST GAPPeople in South Carolina's Firs...
      • BLOGROLLI've updated the link for Aimai's blog, I...
      • BOYS WILL BE BOYS, GIRLS WILL BE SLUTS, KATHLEEN?...
      • GOOD RIDDANCE TO BAD RUBBISHI saw this yesterday:...
      • A CHILDLESS GAY ELITIST NIALL FERGUSON DOESN'T DE...
      • WWMLKD?Salon's Alex Seitz-Wald reports on a planne...
      • DID ANYONE READ THE REST OF THAT MARKEY/GOMEZ POL...
      • MORAL EQUIVALENCE, GRADED ON A SOCIOECONOMIC CURV...
      • THE MULTI-DECADE GOP OBSESSION WITH CARIBOU SEXTi...
      • SO WHAT IS OUR FAVORITE CARHARTT-LOVIN', ELITE-BA...
      • WHAT RIGHT-WINGERS KNOW: YOU DON'T BRING NUANCE T...
      • THEIR POSITION ON BACKGROUND CHECKS IS "LIBERALS ...
      • WHY A TED CRUZ PRESIDENTIAL RUN COULD BE GOOD FOR...
      • EEEK! EEEK! SLEEPER CELL! (OR, MORE LIKELY, NOT)(...
      • MASSACHUSETTS GOP SENATE NOMINEE: YEAH, I WORKED F...
      • GITMO ON THE HUDSON?A couple of months ago I told...
    • ►  April (94)
    • ►  March (30)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile