MoreMisterNice

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, August 18, 2013

Posted on 8:12 AM by Unknown
MONEY, IT'S A HIT -- DON'T GIVE ME THAT DO-GOODY-GOOD BULLSHIT

There's money-grubbing in politics, and Maureen Dowd is shocked, shocked! Well, she's in high dudgeon because it's taking place in Clinton World:
Why is it that America's roil family always seems better in abstract than in concrete? The closer it gets to running the world once more, the more you are reminded of all the things that bugged you the last time around.

The Clintons' neediness, their sense of what they are owed in material terms for their public service, their assumption that they're entitled to everyone’s money.

Are we about to put the "For Rent" sign back on the Lincoln Bedroom?

If Americans are worried about money in politics, there is no larger concern than the Clintons, who are cosseted in a world where rich people endlessly scratch the backs of rich people....
Gee, I can't imagine why the Clintons would be so obsessed with money. Is it possible that I can find a justification for this? Oh, wait! Here's something in the very same issue of The New York Times:
... [Chris Christie] has built a sprawling, 50-state fund-raising network, including major Republican players like Harold Simmons, the billionaire backer of a Karl Rove-led "super PAC" that spent $105 million in the 2012 race.

... Already, Mr. Christie is assembling the kind of national fund-raising network that would be essential to a presidential campaign; some 35 percent of the $9 million he has raised for his [gubernatorial] re-election is from out of state, and he has held fund-raisers around the country, both in donor-rich enclaves like Palm Beach, Fla., and McLean, Va., and in Minneapolis, Pittsburgh, Chicago and throughout California.

... The governor has tapped some boldface contributors like the Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. But more important for his future ambitions are the checks he has gathered from loyal Republican givers like Mr. Simmons, the deep-pocketed Dallas political patron, and lesser-known local power players like Dax R. Swatek, an Alabama lobbyist.

... winning the backing of people like Mr. Swatek, who can raise money from a wide variety of sources, helps the governor reach potential presidential donors in other state capitals and business communities across the country.

Mike DuHaime, Mr. Christie's chief strategist, has also reached out to Mercer Reynolds, a Cincinnati executive who is one of the Republican Party's top contributors and was Mr. Bush’s finance chair in 2000. Earlier this month, Mr. Christie held a fund-raiser at a Las Vegas hotel owned by the casino magnate Sheldon Adelson. Mr. Adelson and his wife, two of the biggest contributors to Republicans last year, were listed as co-hosts and each gave Mr. Christie the maximum contribution of $3,800....
And that's just Christie. Every other big-name Republican in America with eyes on the White House is doing exactly the same thing, or trying to.

Oh, and speaking of "maximum contributions," the Supreme Court, which already overturned limits on contributions to independent groups in presidential elections a while back, is about to overturn limits on contributions to the candidates themselves, in McCutcheon v. FEC, which the Court agreed to hear this past February.

Ahh, but it's the Clintons who might "put the 'For Rent' sign back on the Lincoln Bedroom," because they're somehow uniquely corrupt, according to Dowd. "If Americans are worried about money in politics," writes Dowd, "there is no larger concern than the Clintons."

No larger concern? Seriously, MoDo? Yes, I suppose there are dubious doings in Clinton Land, but the Clintons damn well haven't cornered the market on this sort of thing.

And maybe we're not supposed to worry about spending on the GOP side because the Citizens United cash was poorly spent in 2012 -- but are we just supposed to assume that right-wingers with enough low cunning to become billionaires have no learning curve? Especially when their spending will be effectively without legal limits three years from now?

The White House will be for sale in 2016 no matter what. I just want Sheldon Adelson and a bunch of Bush Pioneers not to be among the principal buyers.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • (no title)
    MORE FROM CATHIE ADAMS: THE SECRET INTERNATIONALIST CAPITALIZATION AGENDA! You may have seen this story: A speaker at a tea party event in ...
  • (no title)
    MORAL EQUIVALENCE, GRADED ON A SOCIOECONOMIC CURVE A confession from a known serial rapist and a DNA match to that serial rapist made clea...
  • (no title)
    GUN LOBBYIST DEFINES DEMOCRATS AS PREY Heard on NPR this morning, in a story about President Obama's trip to Colorado to Colorado toda...
  • (no title)
    BUT ROSS, THERE REALLY IS NO "LIBERTARIAN POPULIST" WING OF THE GOP In today's column, Ross Douthat invokes Bolingbroke'...
  • (no title)
    ...AS OPPOSED TO THE REST OF WASHINGTON, WHICH IS SO SELF-EFFACING Here are the opening paragraphs of Keith Koffler's new Politico col...
  • (no title)
    RELAX -- IT'S NOT 2002 A lot of folks in the left blogosphere are upset at the appearance of a New York Times op-ed urging the U....
  • (no title)
    YIKES (updated) (From the Facebook page of the shooting sports magazine AmmoLand. School Shield is the recent NRA task force proposal fo...
  • (no title)
    PAGING CHRISTOPHER NOLAN I'm bored with the Edward Snowden story. He's been indicted now on Espionage Act charges, but it sure look...
  • (no title)
    TELL ME AGAIN ABOUT HOW THE GOP IS DYING Remember that Reince Priebus Republican "autopsy"? Remember being told that the Republ...
  • (no title)
    THE NEW YORK POST : TOO BIG TO FAIL? Really, what was the potential downside for the New York Post when its editors put an entirely inno...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (500)
    • ►  September (41)
    • ▼  August (77)
      • LET'S GET STUPIDPresident Obama is now asking Con...
      • SURELY YOU PEOPLE CAN'T BE THIS NAIVEIf you belie...
      • STILL WAITING FOR A POST-DEFENSIVE-CROUCH DEMOCRA...
      • IT'S THE CONSPIRACY THEORIES THAT GOT SMALLMichae...
      • THE CATHOLIC LEAGUE'S BILL DONOHUE: OBJECTIVELY P...
      • JUST HOW FAR COULD THE RIGHT TAKE NULLIFICATION ...
      • REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE FOR MAYOR OF NEW YORK THINKS...
      • WORDS FAIL MEHow Fox News is handling the 50th An...
      • JONAH GOLDBERG FORGETS THAT HE'S SUPPOSED TO FAKE ...
      • THIS TIME IT'S (SOMEWHAT) DIFFERENT: "EXTREMISTS ...
      • IS HOWIE KURTZ JUST GIVING HIS NEW BOSSES WHAT TH...
      • PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE MAN BEHIND THE $150,000 S...
      • EVEN THE TRIVIAL TALKING POINTS FROM THE RIGHT AR...
      • REPORTS OF THE DEATH OF WINGNUTTERY ARE GREATLY E...
      • ABRAHAM LINCOLN HAD NO IDEA THAT REPLACING THE ST...
      • THE ONLY WARS AMERICANS SEEM TO LIKE ARE WEDGE-IS...
      • THEY LOVE THE CONSTITUTION SO MUCH THEY'RE MAKING...
      • THE ECONOMIC SABOTAGE THAT ECONOMIC SABOTAGE CREA...
      • FILNER RESIGNS; FREEPERS HAVE A SAD BECAUSE NEW M...
      • THE BEST RACE-BAITING DEFENSE IS A GOOD RACE-BAIT...
      • RIGHT-WINGERS ARE WORKING REALLY HARD TO START A ...
      • THE REAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE DEATHS OF CHRISTO...
      • DEAR REPUBLICANS: MAYBE WE WIN PRESIDENTIAL ELECT...
      • IS BRADLEY MANNING'S GENDER DYSPHORIA THE LAST NAI...
      • BLAMING OBAMA FOR THE KATRINA RESPONSE: WINGNUTS ...
      • BARACK OBAMA: NOT THE FIRST PRESIDENT WHO'S A BLA...
      • SO, WOULD PRESIDENT RAND PAUL PARDON BRADLEY MANN...
      • DID TED CRUZ NEED A WHITE HOUSE ESCORT WHEN HE WO...
      • IN DEFENSE OF EMOPROGS AND O-BOTS (BUT NOT SELF-P...
      • SUPPORT OF CRAZY NIHILIST TEABAGGERS BY BIG BUSIN...
      • RIGHT-WINGERS: GUN CAN FIRE THEMSELVES IF THEY GE...
      • YES, WAS KARL MARX A SATANIST? IS A REAL BOOKThe ...
      • DAVID MIRANDA HAS A LOT OF COMPANYI'm sure you've...
      • SARAH PALIN EITHER GAY-BAITS OBAMA OR QUOTES THE ...
      • MONEY, IT'S A HIT -- DON'T GIVE ME THAT DO-GOODY-...
      • DEMOCRACY IS OPTIONALA couple of my commenters ha...
      • BUT IF THE REPUBLICANS WIN, WILL THEY CONTINUE TH...
      • DEATH TO FALSE METALThe Republican National Commi...
      • WHERE YOU STAND ON THE NSA MOSTLY DEPENDS ON WHER...
      • ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, REPUBLICANS WILL PICK SOMEONE...
      • UNLIKE MAINSTREAM MODERATORS, MARK LEVIN ACTUALLY...
      • A LOUSY ANALOGYIt's rumored that Wendy Davis has d...
      • POLITICO CONCERN-TROLLS CORY BOOKERYou've seen the...
      • SOMEONE NEEDS TO INTRODUCE JENNIFER RUBIN TO SOME...
      • SO HOW DOES THIS DIFFER FROM EVERYTHING ELSE REPU...
      • WE COULD POINT FINGERS THIS WAY ALL NIGHT(updated...
      • ABOUT FACE, COMRADES!Last Friday, Fox Nation gave...
      • STOP-AND-FRISK RULING HAS NEW YORK TABLOIDS FEELI...
      • NO, THERE ISN'T "BIPARTISAN SUPPORT" FOR REFORM O...
      • THE RODEO THING: I'M NOT INCLINED TO MAKE A BIG ...
      • GOOD THING THERE'S NO RACISM ON THE RIGHT, OR THI...
      • PETER KING, BOUNTY HUNTERIn many team sports, it'...
      • NEWSFLASH: DEMOCRATS STILL SUCK AT MESSAGING(this...
      • COULD MURDOCH FAVOR HILLARY IN 2016?This is amusin...
      • JOHN BOEHNER: WORST RABBLE-ROUSER EVER (and other...
      • MORE REPUBLICAN INTRANSIGENCE THAT'S OBAMA'S FAUL...
      • CAN IT BE THAT IT WAS ALL SO SIMPLE THEN, PEGGY?Fr...
      • OH DEAR, I'VE UPSET THE WINGNUTSThe wingers have d...
      • HOW RESTRICTIVE IS REINCE PRIEBUS'S GATED COMMUNI...
      • IS TED CRUZ A HUMAN BEING?Gail Collins thinks Chr...
      • THIS IS WHAT THE TEA PARTY WOULD HAVE BEEN LIKE W...
      • SANTORUM HAD SAND KICKED IN HIS FACEByron York do...
      • TOO GOOD FOR MAUREEN DOWD TO CHECKMaureen Dowd ag...
      • DENNIS PRAGER IS FURIOUS AT THE MASSIVE NUMBERS OF...
      • THE WINGERS' MANDELAThe Daily Caller wants you al...
      • BEZOS: WHO CARES?Amazon founder Jeff Bezos just b...
      • OH CHRIST, LIBERAL McCAINMANIA IS BACKFrom NPR.or...
      • FEEL THE HEAT, PUSHING YOU TO DECIDEMore Christie...
      • WHO IS THIS "WE" YOU SPEAK OF, MR. BOWLING ALONE?...
      • EITHER STOP COLLECTING ALL THAT DATA OR LET ANYON...
      • GILLESPIE'S DEFENSE OF LIBERTARIANISM SIDESTEPS SU...
      • FOX: COMPARE AND CONTRASTStatement causing outrage...
      • WHAT DID YOU DO IN THE FAUX-LIBERTARIAN WAR, DADD...
      • WINGERS HAPPY TO SCRAP THEIR ENTIRE BENGHAZI SCAND...
      • OF ABOVE-THE-LAW CHURCHES AND ADOLF HITLER'S DOGA...
      • ON LIBERTARIAN "DEAL-BREAKERS"In a Washington Pos...
      • BUT WHAT DO THEY ACTUALLY DO WITH ALL THE DATA? Y...
    • ►  July (83)
    • ►  June (83)
    • ►  May (92)
    • ►  April (94)
    • ►  March (30)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile