MoreMisterNice

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, August 11, 2013

Posted on 9:08 AM by Unknown
NEWSFLASH: DEMOCRATS STILL SUCK AT MESSAGING
(this time, possibly by design)


Do Democrats even want the general (i.e., white-majority) public to understand this issue?
Almost three-quarters of all Americans support the idea that people should have to show photo identification to vote, even though they are nearly as concerned about voter suppression as they are about fraud in presidential elections, according to0 a new Washington Post poll....

Overall, there is high, strong and cross-party support for such laws, even though a slim majority of Americans say they have heard "not much" or "nothing" about the issue. Support dips among those who say they have heard more about new photo identification requirements but remains the majority position.

About half of those polled see voter fraud -- people voting who are not eligible to do so or voters casting multiple ballots -- as a "major problem" in presidential elections. One in three see it as a "minor problem." The numbers are nearly as high when it comes to concern about eligible voters being denied their rights....
This is where the Republicans use what I've previously called "ignorance arbitrage." Republicans know that hardly anyone ever commits classic voter fraud -- casting a vote illegally based on fraudulent self-identification. But Republicans also know that the vast majority of voters don't know that. It sure sounds like a problem that might be widespread, and there sure seem to be a lot of government officials and TV pundits upset about the problem, so it really must be a problem, right?

States are passing these laws everywhere governments are controlled by Republicans. Fox pundits are talking about this all the time. That's a lot of GOP messaging. What do Democrats do in return? Once in a great while a few Democrats talk about combating the GOP drive to suppress votes -- but it's never explained. Maybe it's explained on MSNBC or by left-leaning magazines and Web sites, but that's preaching to the choir, because the viewers and readers already get it. Any other messaging is predicated on the assumption that the audience already knows what the problem with these laws is. Black voters, in particular, already do know, to a large extent.

But no one's explaining the problem to persuadable white voters in the middle. This Post poll says that majorities are against depriving eligible voters of the right to vote; furthermore, they think that's also a serious problem. But presumably they can't imagine why it would be hard to obtain government ID. They don't know how a lot of very poor, mostly elderly blacks (and others) have lived in this country, and why some people might not be able to jump the hurdles, as a South Carolina voting rights advocate, Dr. Brenda Williams, has discovered:
One after another, the people came to Williams. Amanda Wolfe, 28, not only did not have a birth certificate but did not know who her birth parents were. Naomi Gordon, 57, had a birth certificate but it misspelled her first name as "Lmnoie," the apparent result of having been birthed by a midwife with sloppy or poor writing skills. Her brother Raymond Rutherford, who works at Wal-Mart, had his name misspelled as Rayman; his only photo ID was one he'd bought from the local liquor store in 1976 for $10. Junior Glover, 78, didn't have a birth certificate; his name was recorded in a family Bible that was destroyed in a fire in 1989.
It's as if Democrats don't want to appeal to the white public with stories like these. It's as if Democrats think fighting these GOP efforts won't matter in most elections because of gerrymandered districts, and the injustice of it will motivate African Americans, in particular, to vote Democrat, and to overcome the voting hurdles in key elections, especially in 2016.

It seems as if Democrats are counting on demographics, Republican extremism, and Hillary Clinton to ensure that the GOP never gets into a position to implement restrictive voter laws across the country. I just hope that's a safe bet, because if Republicans ever can pull that off, the'll have the public behind them. And that scares me.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • (no title)
    MORE FROM CATHIE ADAMS: THE SECRET INTERNATIONALIST CAPITALIZATION AGENDA! You may have seen this story: A speaker at a tea party event in ...
  • (no title)
    MORAL EQUIVALENCE, GRADED ON A SOCIOECONOMIC CURVE A confession from a known serial rapist and a DNA match to that serial rapist made clea...
  • (no title)
    GUN LOBBYIST DEFINES DEMOCRATS AS PREY Heard on NPR this morning, in a story about President Obama's trip to Colorado to Colorado toda...
  • (no title)
    BUT ROSS, THERE REALLY IS NO "LIBERTARIAN POPULIST" WING OF THE GOP In today's column, Ross Douthat invokes Bolingbroke'...
  • (no title)
    ...AS OPPOSED TO THE REST OF WASHINGTON, WHICH IS SO SELF-EFFACING Here are the opening paragraphs of Keith Koffler's new Politico col...
  • (no title)
    RELAX -- IT'S NOT 2002 A lot of folks in the left blogosphere are upset at the appearance of a New York Times op-ed urging the U....
  • (no title)
    YIKES (updated) (From the Facebook page of the shooting sports magazine AmmoLand. School Shield is the recent NRA task force proposal fo...
  • (no title)
    PAGING CHRISTOPHER NOLAN I'm bored with the Edward Snowden story. He's been indicted now on Espionage Act charges, but it sure look...
  • (no title)
    TELL ME AGAIN ABOUT HOW THE GOP IS DYING Remember that Reince Priebus Republican "autopsy"? Remember being told that the Republ...
  • (no title)
    THE NEW YORK POST : TOO BIG TO FAIL? Really, what was the potential downside for the New York Post when its editors put an entirely inno...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (500)
    • ►  September (41)
    • ▼  August (77)
      • LET'S GET STUPIDPresident Obama is now asking Con...
      • SURELY YOU PEOPLE CAN'T BE THIS NAIVEIf you belie...
      • STILL WAITING FOR A POST-DEFENSIVE-CROUCH DEMOCRA...
      • IT'S THE CONSPIRACY THEORIES THAT GOT SMALLMichae...
      • THE CATHOLIC LEAGUE'S BILL DONOHUE: OBJECTIVELY P...
      • JUST HOW FAR COULD THE RIGHT TAKE NULLIFICATION ...
      • REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE FOR MAYOR OF NEW YORK THINKS...
      • WORDS FAIL MEHow Fox News is handling the 50th An...
      • JONAH GOLDBERG FORGETS THAT HE'S SUPPOSED TO FAKE ...
      • THIS TIME IT'S (SOMEWHAT) DIFFERENT: "EXTREMISTS ...
      • IS HOWIE KURTZ JUST GIVING HIS NEW BOSSES WHAT TH...
      • PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE MAN BEHIND THE $150,000 S...
      • EVEN THE TRIVIAL TALKING POINTS FROM THE RIGHT AR...
      • REPORTS OF THE DEATH OF WINGNUTTERY ARE GREATLY E...
      • ABRAHAM LINCOLN HAD NO IDEA THAT REPLACING THE ST...
      • THE ONLY WARS AMERICANS SEEM TO LIKE ARE WEDGE-IS...
      • THEY LOVE THE CONSTITUTION SO MUCH THEY'RE MAKING...
      • THE ECONOMIC SABOTAGE THAT ECONOMIC SABOTAGE CREA...
      • FILNER RESIGNS; FREEPERS HAVE A SAD BECAUSE NEW M...
      • THE BEST RACE-BAITING DEFENSE IS A GOOD RACE-BAIT...
      • RIGHT-WINGERS ARE WORKING REALLY HARD TO START A ...
      • THE REAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE DEATHS OF CHRISTO...
      • DEAR REPUBLICANS: MAYBE WE WIN PRESIDENTIAL ELECT...
      • IS BRADLEY MANNING'S GENDER DYSPHORIA THE LAST NAI...
      • BLAMING OBAMA FOR THE KATRINA RESPONSE: WINGNUTS ...
      • BARACK OBAMA: NOT THE FIRST PRESIDENT WHO'S A BLA...
      • SO, WOULD PRESIDENT RAND PAUL PARDON BRADLEY MANN...
      • DID TED CRUZ NEED A WHITE HOUSE ESCORT WHEN HE WO...
      • IN DEFENSE OF EMOPROGS AND O-BOTS (BUT NOT SELF-P...
      • SUPPORT OF CRAZY NIHILIST TEABAGGERS BY BIG BUSIN...
      • RIGHT-WINGERS: GUN CAN FIRE THEMSELVES IF THEY GE...
      • YES, WAS KARL MARX A SATANIST? IS A REAL BOOKThe ...
      • DAVID MIRANDA HAS A LOT OF COMPANYI'm sure you've...
      • SARAH PALIN EITHER GAY-BAITS OBAMA OR QUOTES THE ...
      • MONEY, IT'S A HIT -- DON'T GIVE ME THAT DO-GOODY-...
      • DEMOCRACY IS OPTIONALA couple of my commenters ha...
      • BUT IF THE REPUBLICANS WIN, WILL THEY CONTINUE TH...
      • DEATH TO FALSE METALThe Republican National Commi...
      • WHERE YOU STAND ON THE NSA MOSTLY DEPENDS ON WHER...
      • ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, REPUBLICANS WILL PICK SOMEONE...
      • UNLIKE MAINSTREAM MODERATORS, MARK LEVIN ACTUALLY...
      • A LOUSY ANALOGYIt's rumored that Wendy Davis has d...
      • POLITICO CONCERN-TROLLS CORY BOOKERYou've seen the...
      • SOMEONE NEEDS TO INTRODUCE JENNIFER RUBIN TO SOME...
      • SO HOW DOES THIS DIFFER FROM EVERYTHING ELSE REPU...
      • WE COULD POINT FINGERS THIS WAY ALL NIGHT(updated...
      • ABOUT FACE, COMRADES!Last Friday, Fox Nation gave...
      • STOP-AND-FRISK RULING HAS NEW YORK TABLOIDS FEELI...
      • NO, THERE ISN'T "BIPARTISAN SUPPORT" FOR REFORM O...
      • THE RODEO THING: I'M NOT INCLINED TO MAKE A BIG ...
      • GOOD THING THERE'S NO RACISM ON THE RIGHT, OR THI...
      • PETER KING, BOUNTY HUNTERIn many team sports, it'...
      • NEWSFLASH: DEMOCRATS STILL SUCK AT MESSAGING(this...
      • COULD MURDOCH FAVOR HILLARY IN 2016?This is amusin...
      • JOHN BOEHNER: WORST RABBLE-ROUSER EVER (and other...
      • MORE REPUBLICAN INTRANSIGENCE THAT'S OBAMA'S FAUL...
      • CAN IT BE THAT IT WAS ALL SO SIMPLE THEN, PEGGY?Fr...
      • OH DEAR, I'VE UPSET THE WINGNUTSThe wingers have d...
      • HOW RESTRICTIVE IS REINCE PRIEBUS'S GATED COMMUNI...
      • IS TED CRUZ A HUMAN BEING?Gail Collins thinks Chr...
      • THIS IS WHAT THE TEA PARTY WOULD HAVE BEEN LIKE W...
      • SANTORUM HAD SAND KICKED IN HIS FACEByron York do...
      • TOO GOOD FOR MAUREEN DOWD TO CHECKMaureen Dowd ag...
      • DENNIS PRAGER IS FURIOUS AT THE MASSIVE NUMBERS OF...
      • THE WINGERS' MANDELAThe Daily Caller wants you al...
      • BEZOS: WHO CARES?Amazon founder Jeff Bezos just b...
      • OH CHRIST, LIBERAL McCAINMANIA IS BACKFrom NPR.or...
      • FEEL THE HEAT, PUSHING YOU TO DECIDEMore Christie...
      • WHO IS THIS "WE" YOU SPEAK OF, MR. BOWLING ALONE?...
      • EITHER STOP COLLECTING ALL THAT DATA OR LET ANYON...
      • GILLESPIE'S DEFENSE OF LIBERTARIANISM SIDESTEPS SU...
      • FOX: COMPARE AND CONTRASTStatement causing outrage...
      • WHAT DID YOU DO IN THE FAUX-LIBERTARIAN WAR, DADD...
      • WINGERS HAPPY TO SCRAP THEIR ENTIRE BENGHAZI SCAND...
      • OF ABOVE-THE-LAW CHURCHES AND ADOLF HITLER'S DOGA...
      • ON LIBERTARIAN "DEAL-BREAKERS"In a Washington Pos...
      • BUT WHAT DO THEY ACTUALLY DO WITH ALL THE DATA? Y...
    • ►  July (83)
    • ►  June (83)
    • ►  May (92)
    • ►  April (94)
    • ►  March (30)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile