MoreMisterNice

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, August 7, 2013

Posted on 11:33 AM by Unknown
SANTORUM HAD SAND KICKED IN HIS FACE

Byron York doesn't understand why Rick Santorum isn't considered the front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination:
In 2012, he won 11 primaries and caucuses, making him the solid second-place finisher in a party that has a long history of nominating the candidate who finished second the last time around. (See Ronald Reagan, Bob Dole, John McCain, and Mitt Romney.) And yet now, no one -- no one -- is suggesting Santorum will be the frontrunner in 2016, should he choose to run. As far as the political handicapping goes, Santorum's 2012 victories don't seem to count for much.
York thinks it's because Santorum had a few gaffes along the way in 2012, and because Santorum has been pigeonholed as a religious nut. The latter rankles York, because, as he notes -- and I'll give him this -- Santorum also talks about the economy:
... of all the Republican candidates in 2012, Santorum was the one who came closest to a position on the economy that might appeal to middle-income voters alienated by both parties. At nearly every stop, Santorum talked about voters who haven't been to college, who aren't the boss, who are out of work or afraid of being out of work. And then, when millions of those very people stayed away from the polls in November -- they could have been the margin of victory for Mitt Romney -- finding a way to connect with them instantly became a top priority for the Republican party.
So why isn't Santorum considered the front-runner for 2016 (when it really looks as if he's planning to run again)? It's simple: he looked bad while losing. Wingnuts crave an avenger who seems to stick it to us awful liberals, and before whom we (allegedly) cower in fear. They thought Sarah Palin was such an avenger, until it became clear that everyone in the non-Republican world was laughing at her, not just liberals. Wingers feel this way right now about Ted Cruz and Rand Paul and Scott Walker and (sometimes) Chris Christie, and even about Allen West.

They also want someone who sticks it to the RINOs. That's what Santorum seemed to be doing to Mitt Romney for a while. But Romney ultimately crushed him. And so now Santorum looks, well, crushed.

If Santorum were defiant -- if he were out there right now looking to pick fights again with liberals and Democrats, and with Republicans who've gone moderate, he might be making a comeback. But he's holding back now. Defeated and bowed is not going to get you to the front of the GOP pack. Better to be like Allen West -- even though he lost a congressional race in a district Mitt Romney won, he's still living in D.C., he's still in the right-wing media attacking the same enemies he attacked as a congressman, and he's talking as if he's destined for greatness ("'Always remember,' he said as he wound up an NPR interview, 'Abraham Lincoln only served one term in Congress, too'"). Santorum, oddly, isn't enough of a blowhard.

****

Maybe Santorum will up his game eventually -- and hell, if a few of the big names sit out the race or falter, maybe he could be in the running again. (Who the hell thought Newt Gingrich could mount the comeback he mounted in 2012? But he talked trash and gave vent to his ego. Winger voters like that. Every time wingers buy an AR-15 or paint Joker makeup on a picture of Obama they think they're personally saving the Republic and the Constitution, so of course they respond to grandiosity in candidates.)

But I'm not sure Santorum can go very far with the message that capitalism is less than perfect:
"First, you have to emphasize that the free market system in America is the best creator of wealth and opportunity in the history of the world," he says. "We have to be committed to that. You absolutely have to emphasize the goodness of that capitalist system."

"But second, you have to emphasize the faults of the capitalist system, which is it doesn't necessarily mean that all boats are going to rise, as some have suggested. If your boat has a hole in it, it's not going to rise, and so you have to talk about what can we do for people who have holes in their boats. And you know what? In America today, that’s a lot of folks. They have all sorts of issues that they have to overcome to be successful. Whether it's family issues, whether its physical or mental health issues, whether it’s skills issues, education issues -- all of us have holes, right?"

... he talks about "training classes for folks who aren't going to college. Whether it's a welding class, or a community college thing, or hotel management, or whatever the case may be, we need to look at non-college career paths and start saying this is going to be a focus of the Republican party. We're going to start to create opportunities for folks who aren't going to go to college."
Oh, wow -- helping people who are economically struggling? Doesn't Santorum realize that Republicans think economic failure is the failing person's own damn fault? Or is a consequence of the fact that government exists at all? Doesn't he realize that Republican voters who have faltered themselves get angry when you start talking about government programs?

And saying that the capitalist system has faults? Them's fightin' words.

Never mind. Sorry I brought this up. Santorum is doomed.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • (no title)
    MORE FROM CATHIE ADAMS: THE SECRET INTERNATIONALIST CAPITALIZATION AGENDA! You may have seen this story: A speaker at a tea party event in ...
  • (no title)
    MORAL EQUIVALENCE, GRADED ON A SOCIOECONOMIC CURVE A confession from a known serial rapist and a DNA match to that serial rapist made clea...
  • (no title)
    GUN LOBBYIST DEFINES DEMOCRATS AS PREY Heard on NPR this morning, in a story about President Obama's trip to Colorado to Colorado toda...
  • (no title)
    BUT ROSS, THERE REALLY IS NO "LIBERTARIAN POPULIST" WING OF THE GOP In today's column, Ross Douthat invokes Bolingbroke'...
  • (no title)
    ...AS OPPOSED TO THE REST OF WASHINGTON, WHICH IS SO SELF-EFFACING Here are the opening paragraphs of Keith Koffler's new Politico col...
  • (no title)
    RELAX -- IT'S NOT 2002 A lot of folks in the left blogosphere are upset at the appearance of a New York Times op-ed urging the U....
  • (no title)
    YIKES (updated) (From the Facebook page of the shooting sports magazine AmmoLand. School Shield is the recent NRA task force proposal fo...
  • (no title)
    PAGING CHRISTOPHER NOLAN I'm bored with the Edward Snowden story. He's been indicted now on Espionage Act charges, but it sure look...
  • (no title)
    TELL ME AGAIN ABOUT HOW THE GOP IS DYING Remember that Reince Priebus Republican "autopsy"? Remember being told that the Republ...
  • (no title)
    THE NEW YORK POST : TOO BIG TO FAIL? Really, what was the potential downside for the New York Post when its editors put an entirely inno...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (500)
    • ►  September (41)
    • ▼  August (77)
      • LET'S GET STUPIDPresident Obama is now asking Con...
      • SURELY YOU PEOPLE CAN'T BE THIS NAIVEIf you belie...
      • STILL WAITING FOR A POST-DEFENSIVE-CROUCH DEMOCRA...
      • IT'S THE CONSPIRACY THEORIES THAT GOT SMALLMichae...
      • THE CATHOLIC LEAGUE'S BILL DONOHUE: OBJECTIVELY P...
      • JUST HOW FAR COULD THE RIGHT TAKE NULLIFICATION ...
      • REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE FOR MAYOR OF NEW YORK THINKS...
      • WORDS FAIL MEHow Fox News is handling the 50th An...
      • JONAH GOLDBERG FORGETS THAT HE'S SUPPOSED TO FAKE ...
      • THIS TIME IT'S (SOMEWHAT) DIFFERENT: "EXTREMISTS ...
      • IS HOWIE KURTZ JUST GIVING HIS NEW BOSSES WHAT TH...
      • PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE MAN BEHIND THE $150,000 S...
      • EVEN THE TRIVIAL TALKING POINTS FROM THE RIGHT AR...
      • REPORTS OF THE DEATH OF WINGNUTTERY ARE GREATLY E...
      • ABRAHAM LINCOLN HAD NO IDEA THAT REPLACING THE ST...
      • THE ONLY WARS AMERICANS SEEM TO LIKE ARE WEDGE-IS...
      • THEY LOVE THE CONSTITUTION SO MUCH THEY'RE MAKING...
      • THE ECONOMIC SABOTAGE THAT ECONOMIC SABOTAGE CREA...
      • FILNER RESIGNS; FREEPERS HAVE A SAD BECAUSE NEW M...
      • THE BEST RACE-BAITING DEFENSE IS A GOOD RACE-BAIT...
      • RIGHT-WINGERS ARE WORKING REALLY HARD TO START A ...
      • THE REAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE DEATHS OF CHRISTO...
      • DEAR REPUBLICANS: MAYBE WE WIN PRESIDENTIAL ELECT...
      • IS BRADLEY MANNING'S GENDER DYSPHORIA THE LAST NAI...
      • BLAMING OBAMA FOR THE KATRINA RESPONSE: WINGNUTS ...
      • BARACK OBAMA: NOT THE FIRST PRESIDENT WHO'S A BLA...
      • SO, WOULD PRESIDENT RAND PAUL PARDON BRADLEY MANN...
      • DID TED CRUZ NEED A WHITE HOUSE ESCORT WHEN HE WO...
      • IN DEFENSE OF EMOPROGS AND O-BOTS (BUT NOT SELF-P...
      • SUPPORT OF CRAZY NIHILIST TEABAGGERS BY BIG BUSIN...
      • RIGHT-WINGERS: GUN CAN FIRE THEMSELVES IF THEY GE...
      • YES, WAS KARL MARX A SATANIST? IS A REAL BOOKThe ...
      • DAVID MIRANDA HAS A LOT OF COMPANYI'm sure you've...
      • SARAH PALIN EITHER GAY-BAITS OBAMA OR QUOTES THE ...
      • MONEY, IT'S A HIT -- DON'T GIVE ME THAT DO-GOODY-...
      • DEMOCRACY IS OPTIONALA couple of my commenters ha...
      • BUT IF THE REPUBLICANS WIN, WILL THEY CONTINUE TH...
      • DEATH TO FALSE METALThe Republican National Commi...
      • WHERE YOU STAND ON THE NSA MOSTLY DEPENDS ON WHER...
      • ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, REPUBLICANS WILL PICK SOMEONE...
      • UNLIKE MAINSTREAM MODERATORS, MARK LEVIN ACTUALLY...
      • A LOUSY ANALOGYIt's rumored that Wendy Davis has d...
      • POLITICO CONCERN-TROLLS CORY BOOKERYou've seen the...
      • SOMEONE NEEDS TO INTRODUCE JENNIFER RUBIN TO SOME...
      • SO HOW DOES THIS DIFFER FROM EVERYTHING ELSE REPU...
      • WE COULD POINT FINGERS THIS WAY ALL NIGHT(updated...
      • ABOUT FACE, COMRADES!Last Friday, Fox Nation gave...
      • STOP-AND-FRISK RULING HAS NEW YORK TABLOIDS FEELI...
      • NO, THERE ISN'T "BIPARTISAN SUPPORT" FOR REFORM O...
      • THE RODEO THING: I'M NOT INCLINED TO MAKE A BIG ...
      • GOOD THING THERE'S NO RACISM ON THE RIGHT, OR THI...
      • PETER KING, BOUNTY HUNTERIn many team sports, it'...
      • NEWSFLASH: DEMOCRATS STILL SUCK AT MESSAGING(this...
      • COULD MURDOCH FAVOR HILLARY IN 2016?This is amusin...
      • JOHN BOEHNER: WORST RABBLE-ROUSER EVER (and other...
      • MORE REPUBLICAN INTRANSIGENCE THAT'S OBAMA'S FAUL...
      • CAN IT BE THAT IT WAS ALL SO SIMPLE THEN, PEGGY?Fr...
      • OH DEAR, I'VE UPSET THE WINGNUTSThe wingers have d...
      • HOW RESTRICTIVE IS REINCE PRIEBUS'S GATED COMMUNI...
      • IS TED CRUZ A HUMAN BEING?Gail Collins thinks Chr...
      • THIS IS WHAT THE TEA PARTY WOULD HAVE BEEN LIKE W...
      • SANTORUM HAD SAND KICKED IN HIS FACEByron York do...
      • TOO GOOD FOR MAUREEN DOWD TO CHECKMaureen Dowd ag...
      • DENNIS PRAGER IS FURIOUS AT THE MASSIVE NUMBERS OF...
      • THE WINGERS' MANDELAThe Daily Caller wants you al...
      • BEZOS: WHO CARES?Amazon founder Jeff Bezos just b...
      • OH CHRIST, LIBERAL McCAINMANIA IS BACKFrom NPR.or...
      • FEEL THE HEAT, PUSHING YOU TO DECIDEMore Christie...
      • WHO IS THIS "WE" YOU SPEAK OF, MR. BOWLING ALONE?...
      • EITHER STOP COLLECTING ALL THAT DATA OR LET ANYON...
      • GILLESPIE'S DEFENSE OF LIBERTARIANISM SIDESTEPS SU...
      • FOX: COMPARE AND CONTRASTStatement causing outrage...
      • WHAT DID YOU DO IN THE FAUX-LIBERTARIAN WAR, DADD...
      • WINGERS HAPPY TO SCRAP THEIR ENTIRE BENGHAZI SCAND...
      • OF ABOVE-THE-LAW CHURCHES AND ADOLF HITLER'S DOGA...
      • ON LIBERTARIAN "DEAL-BREAKERS"In a Washington Pos...
      • BUT WHAT DO THEY ACTUALLY DO WITH ALL THE DATA? Y...
    • ►  July (83)
    • ►  June (83)
    • ►  May (92)
    • ►  April (94)
    • ►  March (30)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile