MoreMisterNice

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, August 11, 2013

Posted on 1:14 PM by Unknown
PETER KING, BOUNTY HUNTER

In many team sports, it's good strategy to occasionally send in a player whose principal job is to hurt an opponent. In basketball, a star player who's scoring well might be slowed down by someone sent in off the other team's bench who hasn't begun amassing his game quota of fouls, and whose job it is to hack away at the star and slow him down. Hockey has the enforcer, the player who specializes in hard hits on opposing players. And, of course, in football there has been the "bounty hunter" phenomenon, most notoriously in recent years in the New Orleans Saints organization: it paid bonuses to players who hit opponents hard enough to force them out of the game.

This is a long way of saying that I don't think Peter King is really running for president -- he's talking about getting into the presidential race because somebody wants him to put a hit on skeptics of foreign policy toughness:
Rep. Peter King says he's dead serious about exploring a bid for the White House, even as GOP strategists and consultants offer steep and potentially insurmountable odds for the New York Republican.

"This is not a game I'm playing, I'm serious," King told The Hill after spending the earlier part of this week in New Hampshire meeting with voters....

King, the former chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee and a member of the highly secretive Intelligence panel, has become a leading voice on television news shows espousing his views on the issue of national security and criticizing the Obama administration.

The issue has become his central platform and initial message to voters, as he tries to guide his party away from the libertarian foreign policy and defense positions held by other potential GOP presidential candidates, such as Sens. Rand Paul (Ky.) and Ted Cruz (Texas).

"This has nothing to do with Rand Paul personally, but I definitely want to keep the party from going the route of what I call the 'Rand Paul isolationist wing' of the party," King said....
Yeah, but King has very little name recognition nationwide, and he's been a high-profile apostate: when Bill Clinton was impeached, he voted no on all four articles of impeachment, and recently he urged donors to withhold money from the National Republican Congressional Committee when Hurricane Sandy aid was held up. (You can stay in the good graces of the GOP base while bashing the GOP, but you'd better bash the party for doing too much social spending, not for failing to do enough.)

So if King is in there as a bounty hunter, who's going to be paying the bounty? I'll venture a guess:
According to Citizens For Responsibility And Ethics In Washington (CREW), King has voted "disproportionately in agreement with the industries regulated by the Homeland Security Committee." As he rose in committee seniority, contributions from the homeland security industries nearly tripled.

Specifically:
During the 2006 election cycle -- the first election cycle after Rep. King assumed a leadership position on the commitee —--contributions from homeland security industries to his campaign committee and PAC increased by 434 percent over the previous cycle, from $34,150 to $182,449.

In contract, total contributions increased by 151 percent during the same period, from $610,412 to $1,530,735.

During the 2010 election cycle, homeland security industries accounted for 13 percent of the $1,713,917 in total contributions received by Rep. King’s campaign committee.
Among King's biggest campaign contributors are defense contractors Northrop Grumman, General Dynamic, and the Raytheon Co., according to The Center For Responsive Politics. The security firm FJC is also a major contributor.

Among the earmarks he's lobbied for -- federal money awarded to businesses and other interests -- the largest sums have gone to New York University, the Webb Institute and American Defense Systems for defense spending, according to statistics from The Center.
Yeah, there'll be people who'll pony up to get him to put a hit on Rand.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • (no title)
    MORE FROM CATHIE ADAMS: THE SECRET INTERNATIONALIST CAPITALIZATION AGENDA! You may have seen this story: A speaker at a tea party event in ...
  • (no title)
    MORAL EQUIVALENCE, GRADED ON A SOCIOECONOMIC CURVE A confession from a known serial rapist and a DNA match to that serial rapist made clea...
  • (no title)
    GUN LOBBYIST DEFINES DEMOCRATS AS PREY Heard on NPR this morning, in a story about President Obama's trip to Colorado to Colorado toda...
  • (no title)
    BUT ROSS, THERE REALLY IS NO "LIBERTARIAN POPULIST" WING OF THE GOP In today's column, Ross Douthat invokes Bolingbroke'...
  • (no title)
    ...AS OPPOSED TO THE REST OF WASHINGTON, WHICH IS SO SELF-EFFACING Here are the opening paragraphs of Keith Koffler's new Politico col...
  • (no title)
    RELAX -- IT'S NOT 2002 A lot of folks in the left blogosphere are upset at the appearance of a New York Times op-ed urging the U....
  • (no title)
    YIKES (updated) (From the Facebook page of the shooting sports magazine AmmoLand. School Shield is the recent NRA task force proposal fo...
  • (no title)
    PAGING CHRISTOPHER NOLAN I'm bored with the Edward Snowden story. He's been indicted now on Espionage Act charges, but it sure look...
  • (no title)
    TELL ME AGAIN ABOUT HOW THE GOP IS DYING Remember that Reince Priebus Republican "autopsy"? Remember being told that the Republ...
  • (no title)
    THE NEW YORK POST : TOO BIG TO FAIL? Really, what was the potential downside for the New York Post when its editors put an entirely inno...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (500)
    • ►  September (41)
    • ▼  August (77)
      • LET'S GET STUPIDPresident Obama is now asking Con...
      • SURELY YOU PEOPLE CAN'T BE THIS NAIVEIf you belie...
      • STILL WAITING FOR A POST-DEFENSIVE-CROUCH DEMOCRA...
      • IT'S THE CONSPIRACY THEORIES THAT GOT SMALLMichae...
      • THE CATHOLIC LEAGUE'S BILL DONOHUE: OBJECTIVELY P...
      • JUST HOW FAR COULD THE RIGHT TAKE NULLIFICATION ...
      • REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE FOR MAYOR OF NEW YORK THINKS...
      • WORDS FAIL MEHow Fox News is handling the 50th An...
      • JONAH GOLDBERG FORGETS THAT HE'S SUPPOSED TO FAKE ...
      • THIS TIME IT'S (SOMEWHAT) DIFFERENT: "EXTREMISTS ...
      • IS HOWIE KURTZ JUST GIVING HIS NEW BOSSES WHAT TH...
      • PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE MAN BEHIND THE $150,000 S...
      • EVEN THE TRIVIAL TALKING POINTS FROM THE RIGHT AR...
      • REPORTS OF THE DEATH OF WINGNUTTERY ARE GREATLY E...
      • ABRAHAM LINCOLN HAD NO IDEA THAT REPLACING THE ST...
      • THE ONLY WARS AMERICANS SEEM TO LIKE ARE WEDGE-IS...
      • THEY LOVE THE CONSTITUTION SO MUCH THEY'RE MAKING...
      • THE ECONOMIC SABOTAGE THAT ECONOMIC SABOTAGE CREA...
      • FILNER RESIGNS; FREEPERS HAVE A SAD BECAUSE NEW M...
      • THE BEST RACE-BAITING DEFENSE IS A GOOD RACE-BAIT...
      • RIGHT-WINGERS ARE WORKING REALLY HARD TO START A ...
      • THE REAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE DEATHS OF CHRISTO...
      • DEAR REPUBLICANS: MAYBE WE WIN PRESIDENTIAL ELECT...
      • IS BRADLEY MANNING'S GENDER DYSPHORIA THE LAST NAI...
      • BLAMING OBAMA FOR THE KATRINA RESPONSE: WINGNUTS ...
      • BARACK OBAMA: NOT THE FIRST PRESIDENT WHO'S A BLA...
      • SO, WOULD PRESIDENT RAND PAUL PARDON BRADLEY MANN...
      • DID TED CRUZ NEED A WHITE HOUSE ESCORT WHEN HE WO...
      • IN DEFENSE OF EMOPROGS AND O-BOTS (BUT NOT SELF-P...
      • SUPPORT OF CRAZY NIHILIST TEABAGGERS BY BIG BUSIN...
      • RIGHT-WINGERS: GUN CAN FIRE THEMSELVES IF THEY GE...
      • YES, WAS KARL MARX A SATANIST? IS A REAL BOOKThe ...
      • DAVID MIRANDA HAS A LOT OF COMPANYI'm sure you've...
      • SARAH PALIN EITHER GAY-BAITS OBAMA OR QUOTES THE ...
      • MONEY, IT'S A HIT -- DON'T GIVE ME THAT DO-GOODY-...
      • DEMOCRACY IS OPTIONALA couple of my commenters ha...
      • BUT IF THE REPUBLICANS WIN, WILL THEY CONTINUE TH...
      • DEATH TO FALSE METALThe Republican National Commi...
      • WHERE YOU STAND ON THE NSA MOSTLY DEPENDS ON WHER...
      • ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, REPUBLICANS WILL PICK SOMEONE...
      • UNLIKE MAINSTREAM MODERATORS, MARK LEVIN ACTUALLY...
      • A LOUSY ANALOGYIt's rumored that Wendy Davis has d...
      • POLITICO CONCERN-TROLLS CORY BOOKERYou've seen the...
      • SOMEONE NEEDS TO INTRODUCE JENNIFER RUBIN TO SOME...
      • SO HOW DOES THIS DIFFER FROM EVERYTHING ELSE REPU...
      • WE COULD POINT FINGERS THIS WAY ALL NIGHT(updated...
      • ABOUT FACE, COMRADES!Last Friday, Fox Nation gave...
      • STOP-AND-FRISK RULING HAS NEW YORK TABLOIDS FEELI...
      • NO, THERE ISN'T "BIPARTISAN SUPPORT" FOR REFORM O...
      • THE RODEO THING: I'M NOT INCLINED TO MAKE A BIG ...
      • GOOD THING THERE'S NO RACISM ON THE RIGHT, OR THI...
      • PETER KING, BOUNTY HUNTERIn many team sports, it'...
      • NEWSFLASH: DEMOCRATS STILL SUCK AT MESSAGING(this...
      • COULD MURDOCH FAVOR HILLARY IN 2016?This is amusin...
      • JOHN BOEHNER: WORST RABBLE-ROUSER EVER (and other...
      • MORE REPUBLICAN INTRANSIGENCE THAT'S OBAMA'S FAUL...
      • CAN IT BE THAT IT WAS ALL SO SIMPLE THEN, PEGGY?Fr...
      • OH DEAR, I'VE UPSET THE WINGNUTSThe wingers have d...
      • HOW RESTRICTIVE IS REINCE PRIEBUS'S GATED COMMUNI...
      • IS TED CRUZ A HUMAN BEING?Gail Collins thinks Chr...
      • THIS IS WHAT THE TEA PARTY WOULD HAVE BEEN LIKE W...
      • SANTORUM HAD SAND KICKED IN HIS FACEByron York do...
      • TOO GOOD FOR MAUREEN DOWD TO CHECKMaureen Dowd ag...
      • DENNIS PRAGER IS FURIOUS AT THE MASSIVE NUMBERS OF...
      • THE WINGERS' MANDELAThe Daily Caller wants you al...
      • BEZOS: WHO CARES?Amazon founder Jeff Bezos just b...
      • OH CHRIST, LIBERAL McCAINMANIA IS BACKFrom NPR.or...
      • FEEL THE HEAT, PUSHING YOU TO DECIDEMore Christie...
      • WHO IS THIS "WE" YOU SPEAK OF, MR. BOWLING ALONE?...
      • EITHER STOP COLLECTING ALL THAT DATA OR LET ANYON...
      • GILLESPIE'S DEFENSE OF LIBERTARIANISM SIDESTEPS SU...
      • FOX: COMPARE AND CONTRASTStatement causing outrage...
      • WHAT DID YOU DO IN THE FAUX-LIBERTARIAN WAR, DADD...
      • WINGERS HAPPY TO SCRAP THEIR ENTIRE BENGHAZI SCAND...
      • OF ABOVE-THE-LAW CHURCHES AND ADOLF HITLER'S DOGA...
      • ON LIBERTARIAN "DEAL-BREAKERS"In a Washington Pos...
      • BUT WHAT DO THEY ACTUALLY DO WITH ALL THE DATA? Y...
    • ►  July (83)
    • ►  June (83)
    • ►  May (92)
    • ►  April (94)
    • ►  March (30)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile