MoreMisterNice

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

Posted on 8:00 AM by Unknown
SUPPORT OF CRAZY NIHILIST TEABAGGERS BY BIG BUSINESS IS JUST TYPICAL QUICK-KILL BIG-BUSINESS THINKING

Greg Sargent writes:
GOP-aligned business groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Federation of Independent Business, and others played a key role in helping elect dozens of conservatives to the House and Senate. Now that these conservatives are trying to drag Congress into multiple confrontations that could do untold economic damage, however, the groups that played such a big role in shaping this Congress are none too happy with the forces they helped unleash.

National Journal's Jill Lawrence has a good piece in which she interviews some of the top officials at these organizations, and finds they are shocked and dismayed by what they have wrought....
... businesses ... don't like brinkmanship on budget and debt issues, or the more routine dysfunction that has stalled transportation and agriculture legislation important to both parties and much of the private sector.

... there is little to no business support for the latest tea-party-driven crusade to block any funding bill that includes money for the health care law, even if it means the government would shut down when the fiscal year ends Sept. 30. Bruce Josten, executive vice president for government affairs at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, calls that "not the politically astute thing to do."...
What this means is that businesses backed the Republicans, including the craziest, most intransigent Republicans, the same way businesses regularly pursue strategies that promise a massive payoff, regardless of the possible huge pitfalls. This is how our businesses always operate. Cautious consideration of potential risk is for losers. Winners go for the big kill, whether it's selling AAA-rated housing securities made up of nothing but toxic loans, or backing lunatic teabaggers who are unfazed at the prospect of driving the country into default. And then our plutocrat overlords seem shocked when the strategy leads to a bad outcome.

Matt Yglesias doesn't buy the notion that business groups are upset by what's going on in the GOP:
... I think the evidence says otherwise. The chamber obviously isn't thrilled with each and every thing that each and every Republican member of Congress has said or done, but the fact is that they are deeply in love with the Republican Party and desperately want to see it gain more political power in the United States. Greg Sargent reminds us that we've seen this before and "[a]fter business groups helped bankroll the Tea Party insurgency in the 2010 midterms, the Congressional GOP staged a debt ceiling crisis in 2011 that those same groups saw as reckless and dangerous." So how mad was the chamber about that? So mad that they spent $24 million to try to help Republicans win Senate races....
Well, yeah, but that's how big business reacts whenever a favorite strategy gets them in trouble -- as soon as they can, they pursue the same damn strategy again. Aren't Wall Streeters engaging in housing speculation again? Haven't they relentlessly fought to prevent regulators from limiting their ability to crash the economy in exactly the same way they crashed it five years ago?

It's hard for the business community to have a normal human response to risk because there is absolutely no possibility that top executives will find themselves genuinely broke and unsure where their next meal is coming from, no matter what they do. As long as they stay out of prison, they will live luxurious lives forever, regardless of how catastrophic their decisions are or what economic destruction those decisions result in for millions of other people. So the possibility that big-kill thinking will lead to disaster inspires no fear. What's the worst that can happen to them?

To sum up: yes, the fat cats don't like what the craziest Republicans in Congress are threatening to do. But they'll keep backing the Republicans, because they always want the huge payoff, risk be damned.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • (no title)
    MORE FROM CATHIE ADAMS: THE SECRET INTERNATIONALIST CAPITALIZATION AGENDA! You may have seen this story: A speaker at a tea party event in ...
  • (no title)
    MORAL EQUIVALENCE, GRADED ON A SOCIOECONOMIC CURVE A confession from a known serial rapist and a DNA match to that serial rapist made clea...
  • (no title)
    GUN LOBBYIST DEFINES DEMOCRATS AS PREY Heard on NPR this morning, in a story about President Obama's trip to Colorado to Colorado toda...
  • (no title)
    BUT ROSS, THERE REALLY IS NO "LIBERTARIAN POPULIST" WING OF THE GOP In today's column, Ross Douthat invokes Bolingbroke'...
  • (no title)
    ...AS OPPOSED TO THE REST OF WASHINGTON, WHICH IS SO SELF-EFFACING Here are the opening paragraphs of Keith Koffler's new Politico col...
  • (no title)
    RELAX -- IT'S NOT 2002 A lot of folks in the left blogosphere are upset at the appearance of a New York Times op-ed urging the U....
  • (no title)
    YIKES (updated) (From the Facebook page of the shooting sports magazine AmmoLand. School Shield is the recent NRA task force proposal fo...
  • (no title)
    PAGING CHRISTOPHER NOLAN I'm bored with the Edward Snowden story. He's been indicted now on Espionage Act charges, but it sure look...
  • (no title)
    TELL ME AGAIN ABOUT HOW THE GOP IS DYING Remember that Reince Priebus Republican "autopsy"? Remember being told that the Republ...
  • (no title)
    THE NEW YORK POST : TOO BIG TO FAIL? Really, what was the potential downside for the New York Post when its editors put an entirely inno...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (500)
    • ►  September (41)
    • ▼  August (77)
      • LET'S GET STUPIDPresident Obama is now asking Con...
      • SURELY YOU PEOPLE CAN'T BE THIS NAIVEIf you belie...
      • STILL WAITING FOR A POST-DEFENSIVE-CROUCH DEMOCRA...
      • IT'S THE CONSPIRACY THEORIES THAT GOT SMALLMichae...
      • THE CATHOLIC LEAGUE'S BILL DONOHUE: OBJECTIVELY P...
      • JUST HOW FAR COULD THE RIGHT TAKE NULLIFICATION ...
      • REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE FOR MAYOR OF NEW YORK THINKS...
      • WORDS FAIL MEHow Fox News is handling the 50th An...
      • JONAH GOLDBERG FORGETS THAT HE'S SUPPOSED TO FAKE ...
      • THIS TIME IT'S (SOMEWHAT) DIFFERENT: "EXTREMISTS ...
      • IS HOWIE KURTZ JUST GIVING HIS NEW BOSSES WHAT TH...
      • PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE MAN BEHIND THE $150,000 S...
      • EVEN THE TRIVIAL TALKING POINTS FROM THE RIGHT AR...
      • REPORTS OF THE DEATH OF WINGNUTTERY ARE GREATLY E...
      • ABRAHAM LINCOLN HAD NO IDEA THAT REPLACING THE ST...
      • THE ONLY WARS AMERICANS SEEM TO LIKE ARE WEDGE-IS...
      • THEY LOVE THE CONSTITUTION SO MUCH THEY'RE MAKING...
      • THE ECONOMIC SABOTAGE THAT ECONOMIC SABOTAGE CREA...
      • FILNER RESIGNS; FREEPERS HAVE A SAD BECAUSE NEW M...
      • THE BEST RACE-BAITING DEFENSE IS A GOOD RACE-BAIT...
      • RIGHT-WINGERS ARE WORKING REALLY HARD TO START A ...
      • THE REAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE DEATHS OF CHRISTO...
      • DEAR REPUBLICANS: MAYBE WE WIN PRESIDENTIAL ELECT...
      • IS BRADLEY MANNING'S GENDER DYSPHORIA THE LAST NAI...
      • BLAMING OBAMA FOR THE KATRINA RESPONSE: WINGNUTS ...
      • BARACK OBAMA: NOT THE FIRST PRESIDENT WHO'S A BLA...
      • SO, WOULD PRESIDENT RAND PAUL PARDON BRADLEY MANN...
      • DID TED CRUZ NEED A WHITE HOUSE ESCORT WHEN HE WO...
      • IN DEFENSE OF EMOPROGS AND O-BOTS (BUT NOT SELF-P...
      • SUPPORT OF CRAZY NIHILIST TEABAGGERS BY BIG BUSIN...
      • RIGHT-WINGERS: GUN CAN FIRE THEMSELVES IF THEY GE...
      • YES, WAS KARL MARX A SATANIST? IS A REAL BOOKThe ...
      • DAVID MIRANDA HAS A LOT OF COMPANYI'm sure you've...
      • SARAH PALIN EITHER GAY-BAITS OBAMA OR QUOTES THE ...
      • MONEY, IT'S A HIT -- DON'T GIVE ME THAT DO-GOODY-...
      • DEMOCRACY IS OPTIONALA couple of my commenters ha...
      • BUT IF THE REPUBLICANS WIN, WILL THEY CONTINUE TH...
      • DEATH TO FALSE METALThe Republican National Commi...
      • WHERE YOU STAND ON THE NSA MOSTLY DEPENDS ON WHER...
      • ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, REPUBLICANS WILL PICK SOMEONE...
      • UNLIKE MAINSTREAM MODERATORS, MARK LEVIN ACTUALLY...
      • A LOUSY ANALOGYIt's rumored that Wendy Davis has d...
      • POLITICO CONCERN-TROLLS CORY BOOKERYou've seen the...
      • SOMEONE NEEDS TO INTRODUCE JENNIFER RUBIN TO SOME...
      • SO HOW DOES THIS DIFFER FROM EVERYTHING ELSE REPU...
      • WE COULD POINT FINGERS THIS WAY ALL NIGHT(updated...
      • ABOUT FACE, COMRADES!Last Friday, Fox Nation gave...
      • STOP-AND-FRISK RULING HAS NEW YORK TABLOIDS FEELI...
      • NO, THERE ISN'T "BIPARTISAN SUPPORT" FOR REFORM O...
      • THE RODEO THING: I'M NOT INCLINED TO MAKE A BIG ...
      • GOOD THING THERE'S NO RACISM ON THE RIGHT, OR THI...
      • PETER KING, BOUNTY HUNTERIn many team sports, it'...
      • NEWSFLASH: DEMOCRATS STILL SUCK AT MESSAGING(this...
      • COULD MURDOCH FAVOR HILLARY IN 2016?This is amusin...
      • JOHN BOEHNER: WORST RABBLE-ROUSER EVER (and other...
      • MORE REPUBLICAN INTRANSIGENCE THAT'S OBAMA'S FAUL...
      • CAN IT BE THAT IT WAS ALL SO SIMPLE THEN, PEGGY?Fr...
      • OH DEAR, I'VE UPSET THE WINGNUTSThe wingers have d...
      • HOW RESTRICTIVE IS REINCE PRIEBUS'S GATED COMMUNI...
      • IS TED CRUZ A HUMAN BEING?Gail Collins thinks Chr...
      • THIS IS WHAT THE TEA PARTY WOULD HAVE BEEN LIKE W...
      • SANTORUM HAD SAND KICKED IN HIS FACEByron York do...
      • TOO GOOD FOR MAUREEN DOWD TO CHECKMaureen Dowd ag...
      • DENNIS PRAGER IS FURIOUS AT THE MASSIVE NUMBERS OF...
      • THE WINGERS' MANDELAThe Daily Caller wants you al...
      • BEZOS: WHO CARES?Amazon founder Jeff Bezos just b...
      • OH CHRIST, LIBERAL McCAINMANIA IS BACKFrom NPR.or...
      • FEEL THE HEAT, PUSHING YOU TO DECIDEMore Christie...
      • WHO IS THIS "WE" YOU SPEAK OF, MR. BOWLING ALONE?...
      • EITHER STOP COLLECTING ALL THAT DATA OR LET ANYON...
      • GILLESPIE'S DEFENSE OF LIBERTARIANISM SIDESTEPS SU...
      • FOX: COMPARE AND CONTRASTStatement causing outrage...
      • WHAT DID YOU DO IN THE FAUX-LIBERTARIAN WAR, DADD...
      • WINGERS HAPPY TO SCRAP THEIR ENTIRE BENGHAZI SCAND...
      • OF ABOVE-THE-LAW CHURCHES AND ADOLF HITLER'S DOGA...
      • ON LIBERTARIAN "DEAL-BREAKERS"In a Washington Pos...
      • BUT WHAT DO THEY ACTUALLY DO WITH ALL THE DATA? Y...
    • ►  July (83)
    • ►  June (83)
    • ►  May (92)
    • ►  April (94)
    • ►  March (30)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile